[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e241d0d4-563d-e111-974e-9e47228f5178@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:26:16 +0530
From: "Kumar, M Chetan" <m.chetan.kumar@...el.com>
To: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
Cc: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxwwan <linuxwwan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/10] net: iosm: drop custom netdev(s) removing
Hi Loic,
On 6/29/2021 7:44 PM, Loic Poulain wrote:
>>> BTW, if IOSM modems have a default data channel, I can add a separate
>>> patch to the series to create a default network interface for IOSM if you tell
>>> me which link id is used for the default data channel.
>>
>> Link id 1 is always associated as default data channel.
>
> Quick question, Isn't your driver use MBIM session IDs? with
> session-ID 0 as the default one?
Link Id from 1 to 8 are treated as valid link ids. These ids are
decremented by 1 to match session id.
In this case link id 1 would be mapped to session id 0. So have
requested link id 1 to be set as default data channel.
Regards,
Chetan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists