[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210723060917.GB32369@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:09:17 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>
Cc: dsahern@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
saeedm@...dia.com, hch@....de, sagi@...mberg.me, axboe@...com,
kbusch@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, edumazet@...gle.com,
smalin@...vell.com, boris.pismenny@...il.com,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
benishay@...dia.com, ogerlitz@...dia.com, yorayz@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 23/36] net: Add to ulp_ddp support for
fallback flow
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 02:03:12PM +0300, Boris Pismenny wrote:
> /* NIC driver informs the ulp that ddp teardown is done - used for async completions*/
> void (*ddp_teardown_done)(void *ddp_ctx);
> + /* NIC request ulp to calculate the ddgst and store it in pdu_info->ddgst */
> + void (*ddp_ddgst_fallback)(struct ulp_ddp_pdu_info *pdu_info);
Overly long line. More importantly this whole struct should probably
use a kerneldoc comment anyway.
> } EXPORT_SYMBOL(ulp_ddp_get_pdu_info);
> + if (!pdu_info || !between(seq, pdu_info->start_seq, pdu_info->end_seq - 1)) {
More overly lone lines. Please make sure to stick to 80 character lines
unless you have a really good to go over that.
> + //check if this skb contains ddgst field
Plase avoid //-style comments.
> + return ulp_ddp_fallback_skb(ctx, skb, sk);
> +} EXPORT_SYMBOL(ulp_ddp_validate_xmit_skb);
This is not how EXPORT_SYMBOLs are place. Also please export any
such deep internal interfaces using EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists