lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d3d2bdb-3750-80dd-3874-def189e0e51f@fb.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 11:39:11 -0700
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
        <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>, <bjorn@...nel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>,
        <daniel@...earbox.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
CC:     <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, <ciara.loftus@...el.com>,
        <joamaki@...il.com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <andrii@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 04/17] selftests: xsk: set rlimit per thread



On 7/27/21 6:17 AM, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
> 
> Set rlimit per thread instead of on the main thread. The main thread
> does not register any umem area so do not need this.

I think setrlimit() is per process. Did I miss anything?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c | 9 +++++----
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
> index 4d8ee636fc24..2100ab4e58b7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
> @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ static void gen_eth_frame(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, u64 addr)
>   
>   static void xsk_configure_umem(struct ifobject *data, void *buffer, int idx)
>   {
> +	const struct rlimit _rlim = { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY };
>   	struct xsk_umem_config cfg = {
>   		.fill_size = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS,
>   		.comp_size = XSK_RING_CONS__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS,
> @@ -263,6 +264,10 @@ static void xsk_configure_umem(struct ifobject *data, void *buffer, int idx)
>   	struct xsk_umem_info *umem;
>   	int ret;
>   
> +	ret = XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_SIZE;
> +	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &_rlim))
> +		exit_with_error(errno);
> +
>   	umem = calloc(1, sizeof(struct xsk_umem_info));
>   	if (!umem)
>   		exit_with_error(errno);
> @@ -1088,13 +1093,9 @@ static void run_pkt_test(int mode, int type)
>   
>   int main(int argc, char **argv)
>   {
> -	struct rlimit _rlim = { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY };
>   	bool failure = false;
>   	int i, j;
>   
> -	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &_rlim))
> -		exit_with_error(errno);
> -
>   	for (int i = 0; i < MAX_INTERFACES; i++) {
>   		ifdict[i] = malloc(sizeof(struct ifobject));
>   		if (!ifdict[i])
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ