lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5957470.R6RXr1ZQNe@pliszka>
Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:03:08 +0200
From:   Sebastian Krzyszkowiak <sebastian.krzyszkowiak@...i.sm>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Cc:     Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
        Amitkumar Karwar <amit.karwar@...pinesignals.com>,
        Angus Ainslie <angus@...ea.ca>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Karun Eagalapati <karun256@...il.com>,
        Martin Fuzzey <martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group>,
        Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>,
        Prameela Rani Garnepudi <prameela.j04cs@...il.com>,
        Siva Rebbagondla <siva8118@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rsi: Fix module dev_oper_mode parameter description

On środa, 15 września 2021 10:08:41 CEST Marek Vasut wrote:
> +#define DEV_OPMODE_PARAM_DESC		\
> +	__stringify(DEV_OPMODE_WIFI_ALONE)	"[Wi-Fi alone], "	\
> +	__stringify(DEV_OPMODE_BT_ALONE)	"[BT classic alone], "	\
> +	__stringify(DEV_OPMODE_BT_LE_ALONE)	"[BT LE], "		
\
> +	__stringify(DEV_OPMODE_BT_DUAL)		"[BT Dual], "		
\
> +	__stringify(DEV_OPMODE_STA_BT)		"[Wi-Fi STA + BT 
classic], " \
> +	__stringify(DEV_OPMODE_STA_BT_LE)	"[Wi-Fi STA + BT LE], "	\
> +	__stringify(DEV_OPMODE_STA_BT_DUAL)	"[Wi-Fi STA + BT 
classic + BT LE], " \
> +	__stringify(DEV_OPMODE_AP_BT)		"[AP + BT classic], "	
\
> +	__stringify(DEV_OPMODE_AP_BT_DUAL)	"[AP + BT classic + BT LE]"

There's still some inconsistency in mode naming - how about: 

- Wi-Fi STA
- BT classic
- BT LE
- BT classic + BT LE
- Wi-Fi STA + BT classic
- Wi-Fi STA + BT LE
- Wi-Fi STA + BT classic + BT LE
- Wi-Fi AP + BT classic
- Wi-Fi AP + BT classic + BT LE

"alone" could be added to the first three modes (you missed it in BT LE).

Cheers,
Sebastian


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ