[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2c7a300-656f-ffec-fb14-2b4e99f28081@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:25:06 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Race between "Generic PHY" and "bcm53xx" drivers after
-EPROBE_DEFER
On 9/20/21 11:17 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
[snip]
>> All I am saying is that there is not really any need to come up with a
>> Device Tree-based solution since you can inspect the mdio_device and
>> find out whether it is an Ethernet PHY or a MDIO device proper, and that
>> ought to cover all cases that I can think of.
>
> Okay, but where's the problem? I guess we're on the same page, and
> you're saying that we should not be calling bcma_mdio_mii_register, and
> assigning the result to bgmac->mii_bus, because that makes us call
> bcma_phy_connect instead of bgmac_phy_connect_direct. But based on what
> condition? Simply if bgmac->phyaddr == BGMAC_PHY_NOREGS?
Yes simply that condition, I really believe it ought to be enough for
the space these devices are in use.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists