netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4 v4] net: dsa: rtl8366rb: Support disabling learning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYaqN8=AcSJMTk_uNfDti_tETQ6LT8=OO74qAHadtRmaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:07:00 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Alvin Šipraga <ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@...lfence.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4 v4] net: dsa: rtl8366rb: Support disabling learning

On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:59 AM Alvin Šipraga <ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk> wrote:
> On 10/4/21 10:57 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:

> > BTW: all the patches i have left are extensions to RTL8366RB
> > specifically so I think it should be fine for you to submit patches
> > for your switch on top of net-next, maybe we can test this
> > on you chip too, I suspect it works the same on all Realtek
> > switches?
>
> Generally speaking I don't think that the patches you have sent for 66RB
> are particularly relevant for the 65MB because the register layout and
> some chip semantics are totally different.

I was mainly thinking about the crazy VLAN set-up that didn't use
port isolation and which is now deleted. But  maybe you were not
using the rtl8366.c file either? Just realtek-smi.c?

> Regarding CPU port learning
> for the RTL8365MB chip: right now I am playing around with the "third
> way" Vladimir suggested, by enabling learning selectively only for
> bridge-layer packets (skb->offload_fwd_mark == true). To begin with I'm
> not even sure if you have this capability with the RTL8366RB.

This will be interesting to see!

Yours,
Linus Walleij