[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211020070526.4xsjqdi54iayen3l@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:05:26 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfc: st95hf: Make spi remove() callback return zero
Hello Krzysztof,
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 08:55:51AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/10/2021 22:49, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > If something goes wrong in the remove callback, returning an error code
> > just results in an error message. The device still disappears.
> >
> > So don't skip disabling the regulator in st95hf_remove() if resetting
> > the controller via spi fails. Also don't return an error code which just
> > results in two error messages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 6 ++----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Given you're the listed maintainer for NFC, I wonder who will take this
patch? I expected you to take this patch and not "only" give your
Reviewed-by tag.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists