[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5eaa4875-3d7a-f1cd-578b-c1ea8db2bf19@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:09:04 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfc: st95hf: Make spi remove() callback return zero
On 20/10/2021 09:05, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 08:55:51AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 19/10/2021 22:49, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> If something goes wrong in the remove callback, returning an error code
>>> just results in an error message. The device still disappears.
>>>
>>> So don't skip disabling the regulator in st95hf_remove() if resetting
>>> the controller via spi fails. Also don't return an error code which just
>>> results in two error messages.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 6 ++----
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
>
> Given you're the listed maintainer for NFC, I wonder who will take this
> patch? I expected you to take this patch and not "only" give your
> Reviewed-by tag.
>
Yeah, it's not that obvious. Maybe I should write subsystem/maintainer
guide for NFC...
All NFC patches are taken by netdev folks (David and Jakub) via
patchwork. You did not CC them here, but you CC-ed the netdev, so let's
hope it is enough. You also skipped linux-nfc, so you might need a file:
$ cat .get_maintainer.conf
--s
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists