[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211125061932.74874-3-tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:19:35 +0800
From: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: kgraul@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 2/2] net/smc: Don't call clcsock shutdown twice when smc shutdown
When applications call shutdown() with SHUT_RDWR in userspace,
smc_close_active() calls kernel_sock_shutdown(), and it is called
twice in smc_shutdown().
This fixes this by checking sk_state before do clcsock shutdown, and
avoids missing the application's call of smc_shutdown().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/1f67548e-cbf6-0dce-82b5-10288a4583bd@linux.ibm.com/
Fixes: 606a63c9783a ("net/smc: Ensure the active closing peer first closes clcsock")
Signed-off-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 4b62c925a13e..7b04cb4d15f4 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -2373,6 +2373,7 @@ static int smc_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int how)
struct smc_sock *smc;
int rc = -EINVAL;
int rc1 = 0;
+ int old_state;
smc = smc_sk(sk);
@@ -2398,7 +2399,12 @@ static int smc_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int how)
}
switch (how) {
case SHUT_RDWR: /* shutdown in both directions */
+ old_state = sk->sk_state;
rc = smc_close_active(smc);
+ if (old_state == SMC_ACTIVE &&
+ sk->sk_state == SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT1)
+ goto out_no_shutdown;
+
break;
case SHUT_WR:
rc = smc_close_shutdown_write(smc);
@@ -2410,6 +2416,8 @@ static int smc_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int how)
}
if (smc->clcsock)
rc1 = kernel_sock_shutdown(smc->clcsock, how);
+
+out_no_shutdown:
/* map sock_shutdown_cmd constants to sk_shutdown value range */
sk->sk_shutdown |= how + 1;
--
2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
Powered by blists - more mailing lists