[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc144dbc-ae56-c763-94f8-c1a5e421e813@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:58:45 +0000
From: <Ajay.Kathat@...rochip.com>
To: <davidm@...uge.net>
CC: <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>, <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wilc1000: Remove misleading USE_SPI_DMA macro
On 07/12/21 05:56, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> The USE_SPI_DMA macro name suggests that it could be set to 1 to
> control whether or not SPI DMA should be used. However, that's not
> what it does. If set to 1, it'll set the SPI messages'
> "is_dma_mapped" flag to true, even though the tx/rx buffers aren't
> actually DMA mapped by the driver. In other words, setting this flag
> to 1 will break the driver.
>
> Best to clean up this confusion by removing the macro altogether.
> There is no need to explicitly initialize "is_dma_mapped" because the
> message is cleared to zero anyhow, so "is_dma_mapped" is set to false
> by default.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@...uge.net>
Thanks!
Acked-by: Ajay Singh <ajay.kathat@...rochip.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/spi.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/spi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/spi.c
> index 640850f989dd..1856525b9834 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/spi.c
> @@ -99,8 +99,6 @@ static int wilc_spi_reset(struct wilc *wilc);
> #define DATA_PKT_LOG_SZ DATA_PKT_LOG_SZ_MAX
> #define DATA_PKT_SZ (1 << DATA_PKT_LOG_SZ)
>
> -#define USE_SPI_DMA 0
> -
> #define WILC_SPI_COMMAND_STAT_SUCCESS 0
> #define WILC_GET_RESP_HDR_START(h) (((h) >> 4) & 0xf)
>
> @@ -240,7 +238,6 @@ static int wilc_spi_tx(struct wilc *wilc, u8 *b, u32 len)
> memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
> spi_message_init(&msg);
> msg.spi = spi;
> - msg.is_dma_mapped = USE_SPI_DMA;
> spi_message_add_tail(&tr, &msg);
>
> ret = spi_sync(spi, &msg);
> @@ -284,7 +281,6 @@ static int wilc_spi_rx(struct wilc *wilc, u8 *rb, u32 rlen)
> memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
> spi_message_init(&msg);
> msg.spi = spi;
> - msg.is_dma_mapped = USE_SPI_DMA;
> spi_message_add_tail(&tr, &msg);
>
> ret = spi_sync(spi, &msg);
> @@ -323,7 +319,6 @@ static int wilc_spi_tx_rx(struct wilc *wilc, u8 *wb, u8 *rb, u32 rlen)
> memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
> spi_message_init(&msg);
> msg.spi = spi;
> - msg.is_dma_mapped = USE_SPI_DMA;
>
> spi_message_add_tail(&tr, &msg);
> ret = spi_sync(spi, &msg);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists