netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net] net/xfrm: IPsec tunnel mode fix inner_ipproto setting in sec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220107110306.GT3272477@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date:   Fri, 7 Jan 2022 12:03:06 +0100
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
CC:     Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <huyn@...dia.com>,
        <saeedm@...dia.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net/xfrm: IPsec tunnel mode fix inner_ipproto
 setting in sec_path

On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 04:47:26PM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 10:32:23AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 01:19:29PM +0200, Raed Salem wrote:
> > > The inner_ipproto saves the inner IP protocol of the plain
> > > text packet. This allows vendor's IPsec feature making offload
> > > decision at skb's features_check and configuring hardware at
> > > ndo_start_xmit, current code implenetation did not handle the
> > > case where IPsec is used in tunnel mode.
> > > 
> > > Fix by handling the case when IPsec is used in tunnel mode by
> > > reading the protocol of the plain text packet IP protocol.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: fa4535238fb5 ("net/xfrm: Add inner_ipproto into sec_path")
> > > Signed-off-by: Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>
> > 
> > Applied, thanks Raed!
> 
> hmm, there are two mlx5 patches that depend on this patch, I thought Raed
> was planning to send them along with this.
> 
> Steffen, is it ok if I submit those two patches to you and so you would
> send them all at once in your next net PR ?

The pull request with that patch included is already merged into
the net tree. So if you pull the net tree, you can apply the
mlx5 patches yourself. But if you prefer, I can take them too.