[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YdhDZ9Fkkx/moJH5@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 14:43:03 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Yevhen Orlov <yevhen.orlov@...ision.eu>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
stephen@...workplumber.org,
Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.mytnyk@...ision.eu>,
Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@...ision.eu>,
Mickey Rachamim <mickeyr@...vell.com>,
Serhiy Pshyk <serhiy.pshyk@...ision.eu>,
Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>,
Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur@...ision.eu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: marvell: prestera: Register
inetaddr stub notifiers
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 03:42:56AM +0200, Yevhen Orlov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 04:34:42PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> >
> > What happens to that RIF when the port is linked to a bridge or unlinked
> > from one?
> >
>
> We doesn't support any "RIF with bridge" scenario for now.
> This restriction mentioned in cover latter.
I did not look at the code. Does it return -EOPNOTSUPP? And then
bridging is performed by the host in software?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists