[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yf3egEVYyyXUkklM@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 20:18:40 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@...achienergy.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH devicetree v3] dt-bindings: phy: Add `tx-p2p-microvolt`
property binding
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:18:09AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 1/19/22 5:11 AM, Marek BehĂșn wrote:
> > Common PHYs and network PCSes often have the possibility to specify
> > peak-to-peak voltage on the differential pair - the default voltage
> > sometimes needs to be changed for a particular board.
> >
> > Add properties `tx-p2p-microvolt` and `tx-p2p-microvolt-names` for this
> > purpose. The second property is needed to specify the mode for the
> > corresponding voltage in the `tx-p2p-microvolt` property, if the voltage
> > is to be used only for speficic mode. More voltage-mode pairs can be
> > specified.
> >
> > Example usage with only one voltage (it will be used for all supported
> > PHY modes, the `tx-p2p-microvolt-names` property is not needed in this
> > case):
> >
> > tx-p2p-microvolt = <915000>;
> >
> > Example usage with voltages for multiple modes:
> >
> > tx-p2p-microvolt = <915000>, <1100000>, <1200000>;
> > tx-p2p-microvolt-names = "2500base-x", "usb", "pcie";
> >
> > Add these properties into a separate file phy/transmit-amplitude.yaml,
> > which should be referenced by any binding that uses it.
>
> p2p commonly means peer to peer which incidentally could be confusing,
> can you spell out the property entire:
>
> tx-peaktopeak-microvolt or:
>
> tx-pk2pk-microvolt for a more compact name maybe?
Peer to peer makes little sense in terms of a voltage. I think this is
fine as-is.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists