lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:13:55 +0800
From:   "shenjian (K)" <shenjian15@...wei.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
        <hkallweit1@...il.com>, <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
        <saeed@...nel.org>, <leon@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linuxarm@...neuler.org>, <lipeng321@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 PATCH net-next 01/20] net: rename net_device->features to
 net_device->active_features



在 2022/3/25 9:35, Jakub Kicinski 写道:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 09:29:51 +0800 shenjian (K) wrote:
>> 在 2022/3/25 9:03, Jakub Kicinski 写道:
>>> I see you mention that the work is not complete in the cover letter.
>>> Either way this patch seems unnecessary, you can call the helpers
>>> for "active" features like you do, but don't start by renaming the
>>> existing field. The patch will be enormous.
>>> .
>> I agree that this patch will be enormous,  I made this patch from suggestion
>> from Andrew Lunn in RFCv3.[1]   Willit make people confused
>> for help name inconsistent with feature name ?
>>
>> [1]https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg777767.html
> Thanks, not sure if I see a suggestion there from Andrew or just
> a question. Maybe you can add a comment instead to avoid surprising
> people?
> .
ok, will drop this patch


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ