[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f90cb41d-da3b-3a7d-e9df-0382ba22b465@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:13:55 +0800
From: "shenjian (K)" <shenjian15@...wei.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
<hkallweit1@...il.com>, <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
<saeed@...nel.org>, <leon@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...neuler.org>, <lipeng321@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 PATCH net-next 01/20] net: rename net_device->features to
net_device->active_features
在 2022/3/25 9:35, Jakub Kicinski 写道:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 09:29:51 +0800 shenjian (K) wrote:
>> 在 2022/3/25 9:03, Jakub Kicinski 写道:
>>> I see you mention that the work is not complete in the cover letter.
>>> Either way this patch seems unnecessary, you can call the helpers
>>> for "active" features like you do, but don't start by renaming the
>>> existing field. The patch will be enormous.
>>> .
>> I agree that this patch will be enormous, I made this patch from suggestion
>> from Andrew Lunn in RFCv3.[1] Willit make people confused
>> for help name inconsistent with feature name ?
>>
>> [1]https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg777767.html
> Thanks, not sure if I see a suggestion there from Andrew or just
> a question. Maybe you can add a comment instead to avoid surprising
> people?
> .
ok, will drop this patch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists