[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YperyVk8bTVT+s2U@krava>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 20:11:21 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] perf tools: Fix prologue generation
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:16:11PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:46:56AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > hi,
> > sending change we discussed some time ago [1] to get rid of
> > some deprecated functions we use in perf prologue code.
> >
> > Despite the gloomy discussion I think the final code does
> > not look that bad ;-)
> >
> > This patchset removes following libbpf functions from perf:
> > bpf_program__set_prep
> > bpf_program__nth_fd
> > struct bpf_prog_prep_result
>
> So, the first patch is already in torvalds/master, I tried applying the
> other two patches to my local perf/core, that already is merged with
> torvalds/master and:
>
> [root@...co ~]# perf test 42
> 42: BPF filter :
> 42.1: Basic BPF filtering : FAILED!
> 42.2: BPF pinning : FAILED!
> 42.3: BPF prologue generation : FAILED!
> [root@...co ~]#
>
> I'll push my local perf/core to tmp.perf/core and continue tomorrow.
hi,
I just rebased my changes on top of your perf/core and it seems to work:
[root@...va perf]# ./perf test bpf
40: LLVM search and compile :
40.1: Basic BPF llvm compile : Ok
40.3: Compile source for BPF prologue generation : Ok
40.4: Compile source for BPF relocation : Ok
42: BPF filter :
42.1: Basic BPF filtering : Ok
42.2: BPF pinning : Ok
42.3: BPF prologue generation : Ok
is it still a problem?
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists