lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 09:32:51 +0000 From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC v4 net-next 11/17] mfd: ocelot: prepend resource size macros to be 32-bit On Sat, 08 Oct 2022, Colin Foster wrote: > The *_RES_SIZE macros are initally <= 0x100. Future resource sizes will be > upwards of 0x200000 in size. > > To keep things clean, fully align the RES_SIZE macros to 32-bit to do > nothing more than make the code more consistent. > > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com> > --- > > v3-v4 > * No change > > v2 > * New patch - broken out from a different one > > --- > drivers/mfd/ocelot-core.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) I'm guessing some of the other patches depend on this? How should it be handled? For my own reference (apply this as-is to your sign-off block): Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists