[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6c8594159368034d47a169ccdd50bc65a1ad894.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 17:23:40 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <amit.karwar@...pinesignals.com>,
Angus Ainslie <angus@...ea.ca>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Martin Fuzzey <martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group>,
Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>,
Prameela Rani Garnepudi <prameela.j04cs@...il.com>,
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak <sebastian.krzyszkowiak@...i.sm>,
Siva Rebbagondla <siva8118@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] wifi: rsi: Fix handling of 802.3 EAPOL frames sent
via control port
On Fri, 2022-11-04 at 17:09 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> In V2 it was suggested I deduplicate this into a separate function,
> since the test is done in multiple places. I would like to keep it
> deduplicated.
Well, it's now a lot simpler, so one might argue that it's not needed.
But anyway you're touching the hot-path of this driver, and making it an
inline still keeps it de-duplicated, so not sure why you wouldn't just
move the rsi_is_tx_eapol into the header file as static inline?
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists