[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230216145145.548183-1-awkrail01@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 23:51:45 +0900
From: Taichi Nishimura <awkrail01@...il.com>
To: rdunlap@...radead.org
Cc: andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, awkrail01@...il.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net,
deso@...teo.net, haoluo@...gle.com, hawk@...nel.org,
iii@...ux.ibm.com, joannelkoong@...il.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, jolsa@...nel.org, kpsingh@...nel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, memxor@...il.com, mykolal@...com,
nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sdf@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org, song@...nel.org, trix@...hat.com,
yhs@...com, ytcoode@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: [Re: PATCH bpf-next] Fix typos in selftest/bpf files
> This text is not needed in the changelog for a patch, please read the
> section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what is needed in order
> to properly describe the change.
> thanks,
> greg k-h
> Hi,
> The corrections all look good.
> Of course, you need to fix what Greg mentioned, then you can resubmit
> the patch with this added:
> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Thanks.
Thank you for your reviewing and advices.
I am a beginner so they are helpful.
I read the docs and re-sent a patch.
After sending it, I found forgetting to reply to this thread...
Sorry in advance.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists