[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <918d1908c2771f4941c191b73c495e20d89a6a99.camel@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:44:48 +0100
From: Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...th.li>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
CC: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: pcs: xpcs: remove double-read of link
state when using AN
Hi Russell,
On Wed, 2023-03-15 at 14:46 +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> Phylink does not want the current state of the link when reading the
> PCS link state - it wants the latched state. Don't double-read the
> MII status register. Phylink will re-read as necessary to capture
> transient link-down events as of dbae3388ea9c ("net: phylink: Force
> retrigger in case of latched link-fail indicator").
>
> The above referenced commit is a dependency for this change, and thus
> this change should not be backported to any kernel that does not
> contain the above referenced commit.
>
> Fixes: fcb26bd2b6ca ("net: phy: Add Synopsys DesignWare XPCS MDIO module")
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> ---
> drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c | 13 ++-----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> index bc428a816719..04a685353041 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static int xpcs_read_fault_c73(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int xpcs_read_link_c73(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, bool an)
> +static int xpcs_read_link_c73(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs)
> {
> bool link = true;
> int ret;
> @@ -333,15 +333,6 @@ static int xpcs_read_link_c73(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, bool an)
> if (!(ret & MDIO_STAT1_LSTATUS))
> link = false;
>
> - if (an) {
> - ret = xpcs_read(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_AN, MDIO_STAT1);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> -
> - if (!(ret & MDIO_STAT1_LSTATUS))
> - link = false;
> - }
> -
> return link;
> }
>
> @@ -935,7 +926,7 @@ static int xpcs_get_state_c73(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
> int ret;
>
> /* Link needs to be read first ... */
> - state->link = xpcs_read_link_c73(xpcs, state->an_enabled) > 0 ? 1 : 0;
> + state->link = xpcs_read_link_c73(xpcs) > 0 ? 1 : 0;
Couldn't you just say:
state->link = xpcs_read_link_c73(xpcs) > 0;
That should be a boolean, right?
>
> /* ... and then we check the faults. */
> ret = xpcs_read_fault_c73(xpcs, state);
> --
> 2.30.2
>
BR
Steen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists