[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZC7FYQDj4aTvaC9v@makrotopia.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 14:13:05 +0100
From: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: arinc9.unal@...il.com, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mt7530: fix port specifications
for MT7988
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 12:07:01PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 01:04:45PM +0300, arinc9.unal@...il.com wrote:
> > From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
> >
> > On the switch on the MT7988 SoC, there are only 4 PHYs. There's only port 6
> > as the CPU port, there's no port 5. Split the switch statement with a check
> > to enforce these for the switch on the MT7988 SoC. The internal phy-mode is
> > specific to MT7988 so put it for MT7988 only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Daniel, this is based on the information you provided me about the switch.
> > I will add this to my current patch series if it looks good to you.
> >
> > Arınç
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> > index 6fbbdcb5987f..f167fa135ef1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> > @@ -2548,7 +2548,7 @@ static void mt7988_mac_port_get_caps(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> > phy_interface_zero(config->supported_interfaces);
> >
> > switch (port) {
> > - case 0 ... 4: /* Internal phy */
> > + case 0 ... 3: /* Internal phy */
> > __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_INTERNAL,
> > config->supported_interfaces);
> > break;
> > @@ -2710,37 +2710,56 @@ mt753x_phylink_mac_config(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, unsigned int mode,
> > struct mt7530_priv *priv = ds->priv;
> > u32 mcr_cur, mcr_new;
> >
> > - switch (port) {
> > - case 0 ... 4: /* Internal phy */
> > - if (state->interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_GMII &&
> > - state->interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_INTERNAL)
> > - goto unsupported;
> > - break;
> > - case 5: /* Port 5, a CPU port. */
> > - if (priv->p5_interface == state->interface)
> > + if (priv->id == ID_MT7988) {
> > + switch (port) {
> > + case 0 ... 3: /* Internal phy */
> > + if (state->interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_INTERNAL)
>
> How do these end up with PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_INTERNAL ? phylib defaults
> to GMII mode without something else being specified in DT.
As the link between mtk_eth_soc MAC and built-in switch as well as the
links between the built-in switch and the 4 built-in gigE PHYs are
internal, I wanted to describe them as such.
This was a reaction to the justified criticism that it doesn't make
sense to add 10GBase-KR and USXGMII as a proxy to actually indicate the
internal link between mt7530 CPU port and mtk_eth_soc gmac1 on the
MT7988, which Arınç had expressed in a review comment.
The phy-mode in the to-be-submitted DTS for MT7988 will be 'internal'
to describe the GMAC1<->MT7530 link as well as the MT7530<->gigE-PHY
links. I understand that for the built-in gigE PHYs we could just as
well us 'gmii', however, I thought that using 'internal' would be less
confusing as there is no actual GMII hardware interface.
And that's even more true for the link between GMAC1 and the built-in
switch, there are no actual USXGMII or 10GBase-KR hardware interfaces
but rather just a stateless internal link.
Sidenote: The same applies also for the link between GMAC2 and the
built-in 2500Base-T PHY. MediaTek was using 'xgmii' as PHY mode here to
program the internal muxes to connect the internal PHY with GMAC2, and
it took me a while to understand that there is no actual XGMII
interface anywhere, but they were rather just using this otherwise
unused interface mode as a flag for that...
Hence I decided to also use 'internal' PHY mode there, especially as in
this case there are several options: GMAC2 can also be connected to an
actual 1.25Gbaud/3.25Gbaud SGMII interface (pcs-mtk-lynxi again) OR an
actual 10GBase-KR/USXGMII SerDes, both can be muxed to the same pins
used to connect an external PHYs to the SoC.
Hence "phy-mode = 'internal';" will be a common occurance in mt7988.dtsi.
>
> Also note that you should *not* be validating state->interface in the
> mac_config() method because it's way too late to reject it - if you get
> an unsupported interface here, then that is down to the get_caps()
> method being buggy. Only report interfaces in get_caps() that you are
> prepared to handle in the rest of the system.
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists