[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7a0dc51-c3dd-49e5-b66e-da9ddcc9e071@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:48:49 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Correct cmode to
PHY_INTERFACE_
> On 4/11/2023 4:38 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 04:35:41AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > The switch can either take the MAC or the PHY role in an MII or RMII
> > > link. There are distinct PHY_INTERFACE_ macros for these two roles.
> > > Correct the mapping so that the `REV` version is used for the PHY
> > > role.
> > > static const u8 mv88e6xxx_phy_interface_modes[] = {
> > > - [MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_CMODE_MII_PHY] = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII,
> > > + [MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_CMODE_MII_PHY] = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_REVMII,
>
> Is this hunk correct?
Hi Florian
I don't see why it is wrong, but you can be blind to bugs in your own
code. What do you think is wrong?
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists