netdev - Re: [PATCH net] bgmac: fix *initial* chip reset to support BCM5358

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <569c0f2f-ff7b-9367-e33e-ddf37a13232b@collabora.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:08:25 +0200
From:   Ricardo Cañuelo <ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com>
To:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
        Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bgmac: fix *initial* chip reset to support BCM5358

Hi Thorsten,

On 14/4/23 16:04, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> What happened to this? It seems there wasn't any progress since above
> mail week. But well, seems to be a odd issue anyway (is that one of
> those issues that CI systems find, but don't cause practical issues in
> the field?). Hence: can somebody with more knowledge about this please
> tell if it this is something I can likely drop from the list of tacked
> regressions?

 From Rafał's answer, I think we can consider this a false positive and move on.

Cheers,
Ricardo