[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ea3d1c37-e621-3416-7f3b-d81307627c55@leemhuis.info>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:12:33 +0200
From: "Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Ricardo Cañuelo <ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bgmac: fix *initial* chip reset to support BCM5358
On 14.04.23 16:08, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> On 14/4/23 16:04, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>> What happened to this? It seems there wasn't any progress since above
>> mail week. But well, seems to be a odd issue anyway (is that one of
>> those issues that CI systems find, but don't cause practical issues in
>> the field?). Hence: can somebody with more knowledge about this please
>> tell if it this is something I can likely drop from the list of tacked
>> regressions?
>
> From Rafał's answer, I think we can consider this a false positive and
> move on.
great, thx for confirming!
#regzbot inconclusive: CI false positive
#regzbot ignore-activity
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists