netdev - [PATCH net-next 2/5] mptcp: avoid unneeded __mptcp_nmpc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:08:01 +0200
From:   Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
To:     mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/5] mptcp: avoid unneeded __mptcp_nmpc_socket()
 usage

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>

In a few spots, the mptcp code invokes the __mptcp_nmpc_socket() helper
multiple times under the same socket lock scope. Additionally, in such
places, the socket status ensures that there is no MP capable handshake
running.

Under the above condition we can replace the later __mptcp_nmpc_socket()
helper invocation with direct access to the msk->subflow pointer and
better document such access is not supposed to fail with WARN().

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index e6cb36784a68..9cdcfdb44aee 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -3143,7 +3143,7 @@ static struct sock *mptcp_accept(struct sock *sk, int flags, int *err,
 	struct socket *listener;
 	struct sock *newsk;
 
-	listener = __mptcp_nmpc_socket(msk);
+	listener = msk->subflow;
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!listener)) {
 		*err = -EINVAL;
 		return NULL;
@@ -3363,7 +3363,7 @@ static int mptcp_get_port(struct sock *sk, unsigned short snum)
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
 	struct socket *ssock;
 
-	ssock = __mptcp_nmpc_socket(msk);
+	ssock = msk->subflow;
 	pr_debug("msk=%p, subflow=%p", msk, ssock);
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ssock))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -3709,7 +3709,10 @@ static int mptcp_stream_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock,
 
 	pr_debug("msk=%p", msk);
 
-	ssock = __mptcp_nmpc_socket(msk);
+	/* buggy applications can call accept on socket states other then LISTEN
+	 * but no need to allocate the first subflow just to error out.
+	 */
+	ssock = msk->subflow;
 	if (!ssock)
 		return -EINVAL;
 

-- 
2.39.2