netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] ipv4: Fix potential uninit variable access buf in __ip_make

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47a697fb-1f69-3a47-e6ee-6a6c2a3a3cdc@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 17:41:04 +0800
From:   "Ziyang Xuan (William)" <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ipv4: Fix potential uninit variable access buf in
 __ip_make_skb()

> Ziyang Xuan (William) wrote:
>>>> Ziyang Xuan wrote:
>>>>> Like commit ea30388baebc ("ipv6: Fix an uninit variable access bug in
>>>>> __ip6_make_skb()"). icmphdr does not in skb linear region under the
>>>>> scenario of SOCK_RAW socket. Access icmp_hdr(skb)->type directly will
>>>>> trigger the uninit variable access bug.
>>>>>
>>>>> Use a local variable icmp_type to carry the correct value in different
>>>>> scenarios.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 96793b482540 ("[IPV4]: Add ICMPMsgStats MIB (RFC 4293)")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> v2:
>>>>>   - Use sk->sk_type not sk->sk_socket->type.
>>>>
>>>> This is reached through
>>>>
>>>>   raw_sendmsg
>>>>     raw_probe_proto_opt
>>>>     ip_push_pending_frames
>>>>       ip_finish_skb
>>>>         __ip_make_skb
>>>>
>>>> At this point, the icmp header has already been copied into skb linear
>>>> area. Is the isue that icmp_hdr/skb_transport_header is not set in
>>>> this path? 
>>>>
>>> Hello Willem,
>>>
>>> raw_sendmsg
>>>   ip_append_data(..., transhdrlen==0, ...) // !inet->hdrincl
>>>
>>> Parameter "transhdrlen" of ip_append_data() equals to 0 in raw_sendmsg()
>>> not sizeof(struct icmphdr) as in ping_v4_sendmsg().
>>>
>>> William Xuan.
>> Hello Willem,
>>
>> Does my answer answer your doubts?
> 
> Thanks. Yes, that explains. Would you mind adding a comment to that
> effect. Sommething like
> 
>     /* for such sockets, transport hlen is zero and icmp_hdr incorrect */
>     if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_RAW && !inet_sk(sk)->hdrincl)
> 
That is fine. It will make other developers understand the logic here quickly.

> I missed your previous response, William. Sorry about that.
>  
>> William Xuan
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 12 +++++++++---
>>>>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
>>>>> index 4e4e308c3230..21507c9ce0fc 100644
>>>>> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
>>>>> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
>>>>> @@ -1570,9 +1570,15 @@ struct sk_buff *__ip_make_skb(struct sock *sk,
>>>>>  	cork->dst = NULL;
>>>>>  	skb_dst_set(skb, &rt->dst);
>>>>>  
>>>>> -	if (iph->protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP)
>>>>> -		icmp_out_count(net, ((struct icmphdr *)
>>>>> -			skb_transport_header(skb))->type);
>>>>> +	if (iph->protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP) {
>>>>> +		u8 icmp_type;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +		if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_RAW && !inet_sk(sk)->hdrincl)
>>>>> +			icmp_type = fl4->fl4_icmp_type;
>>>>> +		else
>>>>> +			icmp_type = icmp_hdr(skb)->type;
>>>>> +		icmp_out_count(net, icmp_type);
>>>>> +	}
>>>>>  
>>>>>  	ip_cork_release(cork);
>>>>>  out:
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
> 
> 
> .
>