netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next v9 5/9] net: txgbe: Add SFP module identify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <03ac01d992d2$67c1ec90$3745c5b0$@trustnetic.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 16:40:36 +0800
From: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
To: "'Russell King \(Oracle\)'" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"'kernel test robot'" <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	<jsd@...ihalf.com>,
	<Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
	<andrew@...n.ch>,
	<hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	<oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>,
	<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	<mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>,
	"'Piotr Raczynski'" <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v9 5/9] net: txgbe: Add SFP module identify

On Monday, May 29, 2023 10:06 AM, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> On Friday, May 26, 2023 7:37 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 07:30:45PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > Kconfig warnings: (for reference only)
> > >    WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
> > >    Depends on [n]: I2C [=n] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && (ACPI && COMMON_CLK [=y] || !ACPI)
> > >    Selected by [y]:
> > >    - TXGBE [=y] && NETDEVICES [=y] && ETHERNET [=y] && NET_VENDOR_WANGXUN [=y] && PCI [=y]
> > >    WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SFP
> > >    Depends on [n]: NETDEVICES [=y] && PHYLIB [=y] && I2C [=n] && PHYLINK [=y] && (HWMON [=n] || HWMON [=n]=n)
> > >    Selected by [y]:
> > >    - TXGBE [=y] && NETDEVICES [=y] && ETHERNET [=y] && NET_VENDOR_WANGXUN [=y] && PCI [=y]
> >
> > ... and is basically caused by "select SFP". No. Do not do this unless
> > you look at the dependencies for SFP and ensure that those are also
> > satisfied - because if you don't you create messes like the above
> > build errors.
> 
> So how do I make sure that the module I need compiles and loads correctly,
> rely on the user to manually select it?

When I changed the TXGBE config to:
...
	depends on SFP
	select PCS_XPCS
...
the compilation gave an error:

drivers/net/phy/Kconfig:16:error: recursive dependency detected!
drivers/net/phy/Kconfig:16:     symbol PHYLIB is selected by PHYLINK
drivers/net/phy/Kconfig:6:      symbol PHYLINK is selected by PCS_XPCS
drivers/net/pcs/Kconfig:8:      symbol PCS_XPCS is selected by TXGBE
drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/Kconfig:40:        symbol TXGBE depends on SFP
drivers/net/phy/Kconfig:63:     symbol SFP depends on PHYLIB
For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst
subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"

Seems deleting "depends on SFP" is the correct way. But is this normal?
How do we ensure the dependency between TXGBE and SFP?