netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Integer overflows while scanning for integers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 16:36:12 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Integer overflows while scanning for integers

On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 12:37:54AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Lately I wondered whether users of integer scanning functions check
> for overflows.
> To detect such overflows around scanf I came up with the following
> patch. It simply triggers a WARN_ON_ONCE() upon an overflow.
> 
> After digging into various scanf users I found that the network device
> naming code can trigger an overflow.
> 
> e.g:
> $ ip link add 1 type veth peer name 9999999999
> $ ip link set name "%d" dev 1
> 
> It will trigger the following WARN_ON_ONCE():
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 433 at lib/vsprintf.c:3701 vsscanf+0x6ce/0x990

Hm, it's considered a bug if a WARN or BUG can be reached from
userspace, so this probably needs to be rearranged (or callers fixed).
Do we need to change the scanf API for sane use inside the kernel?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook