[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230807093727.5249f517@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:37:27 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
Cc: "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>, "edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "davem@...emloft.net"
<davem@...emloft.net>, "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, Paul
Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: Error 'netif_napi_add_weight() called with weight 256'
On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:57:15 +0000 Hayes Wang wrote:
> > Perhaps Hayes Wang can comment on this (as the author of 195aae321c82).
>
> I test our devices on an Embedded system.
> We find the throughput is low.
> And it is caused by the weight.
> Our NAPI function often uses the whole budget.
> Finally, we increase the weight, and the throughput is good.
Could it possibly be related to handling of aggregation?
Problem must lay somewhere in USB specifics, since as I said
there are 100Gbps devices running fine with budget of 64.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists