[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1b227e7-0653-da6c-a8b6-0e97121bb847@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 21:25:23 +0800
From: shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <shuah@...nel.org>
CC: <j.vosburgh@...il.com>, <andy@...yhouse.net>, <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
<yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: bonding: delete link1_1 in the
cleanup path
On 2023/8/24 18:31, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-08-23 at 11:26 +0800, Zhengchao Shao wrote:
>> If failed to set link1_1 to netns client, we should delete link1_1 in the
>> cleanup path. But if set link1_1 to netns client successfully, delete
>> link1_1 will report warning. So delete link1_1 in the cleanup path and
>> drop any warning message.
>
> I think the same could happen also for the link1_2 device.
>
> It would probably be safer creating directly the devices in the target
> namespaces, with the 'final' name
>
> ip link add dev eth0 netns client type veth peer name eth0 netns server
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paolo
>
Yeah, it looks good, I will send v2.
Thank you.
Zhengchao Shao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists