netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] tcp: new TCP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 09:36:30 -0400
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Aananth V <aananthv@...gle.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] tcp: new TCP_INFO stats for RTO events

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 5:02 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 02:33 +0000, Aananth V wrote:
> > @@ -2825,6 +2829,14 @@ void tcp_enter_recovery(struct sock *sk, bool ece_ack)
> >       tcp_set_ca_state(sk, TCP_CA_Recovery);
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline void tcp_update_rto_time(struct tcp_sock *tp)
> > +{
> > +     if (tp->rto_stamp) {
> > +             tp->total_rto_time += tcp_time_stamp(tp) - tp->rto_stamp;
> > +             tp->rto_stamp = 0;
> > +     }
> > +}
>
> The CI is complaining about 'inline' function in .c file. I guess that
> is not by accident and the goal is to maximize fast-path performances?
>
> Perhaps worthy moving the function to an header file to make static
> checkers happy?

or simply remove the inline keyword since it's only used in that file.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Paolo
>