netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v5 01/10] netdev-genl: spec: Extend netdev netlink spec in YAML for queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231020150557.00af950d@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 15:05:57 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>,
 <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v5 01/10] netdev-genl: spec: Extend netdev
 netlink spec in YAML for queue

On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:26:38 -0700 Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
> > WARNING:SPACING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
> > #547: FILE: tools/net/ynl/generated/netdev-user.h:181:
> > +	struct netdev_queue_get_rsp obj __attribute__ ((aligned (8)));
> 
> Looks like the series is in "Changes Requested" state following these 
> warnings. Is there any recommendation for warnings on generated code? I 
> see similar issues on existing code in the generated file.

Yes, ignore this one. I'll post a change to the codegen.
The warning on patch 3 is legit, right?

kernel test bot folks, please be careful with the checkpatch warnings.
Some of them are bogus. TBH I'm not sure how much value running
checkpatch in the bot adds. It's really trivial to run for the
maintainers when applying patches.