lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:26:38 -0700
From: "Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v5 01/10] netdev-genl: spec: Extend netdev
 netlink spec in YAML for queue

On 10/18/2023 7:12 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Amritha,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> 
> [auto build test WARNING on net-next/main]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Amritha-Nambiar/netdev-genl-spec-Extend-netdev-netlink-spec-in-YAML-for-queue/20231019-082941
> base:   net-next/main
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/169767396671.6692.9945461089943525792.stgit%40anambiarhost.jf.intel.com
> patch subject: [net-next PATCH v5 01/10] netdev-genl: spec: Extend netdev netlink spec in YAML for queue
> reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231019/202310190900.9Dzgkbev-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310190900.9Dzgkbev-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> # many are suggestions rather than must-fix
> 
> WARNING:SPACING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
> #547: FILE: tools/net/ynl/generated/netdev-user.h:181:
> +	struct netdev_queue_get_rsp obj __attribute__ ((aligned (8)));
> 

Looks like the series is in "Changes Requested" state following these 
warnings. Is there any recommendation for warnings on generated code? I 
see similar issues on existing code in the generated file.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ