lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231024164234.46e9bb5f@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 16:42:34 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>, Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>, Rafal Romanowski <rafal.romanowski@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/9] iavf: in iavf_down, disable queues when removing the driver On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:08:21 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote: > From: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com> > > In iavf_down, we're skipping the scheduling of certain operations if > the driver is being removed. However, the IAVF_FLAG_AQ_DISABLE_QUEUES > request must not be skipped in this case, because iavf_close waits > for the transition to the __IAVF_DOWN state, which happens in > iavf_virtchnl_completion after the queues are released. > > Without this fix, "rmmod iavf" takes half a second per interface that's > up and prints the "Device resources not yet released" warning. > > Fixes: c8de44b577eb ("iavf: do not process adminq tasks when __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK is set") This looks like a 6.6 regression, why send it for net-next?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists