[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72n6Cvxydcef03kEo9fy=5Zd7MXYqFUGX1MBaTKF2o63nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 13:02:57 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
tmgross@...ch.edu, benno.lossin@...ton.me, wedsonaf@...il.com,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 3/5] rust: add second `bindgen` pass for enum
exhaustiveness checking
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 2:16 AM FUJITA Tomonori
<fujita.tomonori@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
>
> This patch makes sure that the C's enum is sync with Rust sides. If
> the enum is out of sync, compiling fails with an error like the
> following.
>
> Note that this is a temporary solution. It will be replaced with
> bindgen when it supports generating the enum conversion code.
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Please do not modify patches from others without warning that you did
so. I did not write this commit message nor agreed to this, but it
looks as if I did. I even explicitly said I would send the patch
independently.
As I recently told you, if you want to pick it up in your series to
showcase how it would work, you should have at least kept the WIP, put
it at the end of the series and added RFC since it is not intended to
be merged with your other patches.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists