netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 3/5] rust: add second `bindgen` pass for enum exhaustiveness checking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231026.205434.963307210202715112.fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 20:54:34 +0900 (JST)
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
To: miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com
Cc: fujita.tomonori@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, tmgross@...ch.edu,
 benno.lossin@...ton.me, wedsonaf@...il.com, ojeda@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 3/5] rust: add second `bindgen` pass for
 enum exhaustiveness checking

On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 13:02:57 +0200
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 2:16 AM FUJITA Tomonori
> <fujita.tomonori@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
>>
>> This patch makes sure that the C's enum is sync with Rust sides. If
>> the enum is out of sync, compiling fails with an error like the
>> following.
>>
>> Note that this is a temporary solution. It will be replaced with
>> bindgen when it supports generating the enum conversion code.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
> 
> Please do not modify patches from others without warning that you did
> so. I did not write this commit message nor agreed to this, but it
> looks as if I did. I even explicitly said I would send the patch
> independently.
>
> As I recently told you, if you want to pick it up in your series to
> showcase how it would work, you should have at least kept the WIP, put
> it at the end of the series and added RFC since it is not intended to
> be merged with your other patches.

Sorry, I totally misunderstand your intention. I thought that the PHY
abstractions needs to be merged with your patch together.

I'll drop your patch in the next version and focus on my patches.