[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DM6PR04MB4202DA43D14985A28055CE0FC56F2@DM6PR04MB4202.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 18:57:36 +0000
From: "Nassiri, Mohammad" <mnassiri@...na.com>
To: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
David
Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...sta.com>,
Bob Gilligan
<gilligan@...sta.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 12/12] selftests/net: Add TCP-AO key-management test
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
>Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2023 9:36 PM
>+
>+static void end_server(const char *tst_name, int sk,
>+ struct tcp_ao_counters *begin) {
>+ struct tcp_ao_counters end;
>+
>+ if (test_get_tcp_ao_counters(sk, &end))
>+ test_error("test_get_tcp_ao_counters()");
>+ verify_keys(tst_name, sk, false, true);
>+
>+ synchronize_threads(); /* 4: verified => closed */
>+ close(sk);
>+
>+ verify_counters(tst_name, true, false, begin, &end);
Shouldn't it be reversed instead?
verify_counters(tst_name, false, true, begin, &end);
The sk is an accept socket and the function is called by the server.
>+ synchronize_threads(); /* 5: counters */ }
>+
>+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>+{
>+ test_init(120, server_fn, client_fn);
>+ return 0;
>+}
>
>--
>2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists