[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZbuviFaciTADMkMk@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 06:49:44 -0800
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: "Bernstein, Amit" <amitbern@...zon.com>
Cc: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Dagan, Noam" <ndagan@...zon.com>,
"Arinzon, David" <darinzon@...zon.com>,
"Agroskin, Shay" <shayagr@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: Add PHC support with error bound value for ENA driver
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 07:24:51AM +0000, Bernstein, Amit wrote:
> In one of the upcoming releases, we're planning to add PHC support
> to the ENA driver (/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/) To provide the
> best experience for service customers, the ENA driver will expose an
> error_bound parameter (expressed in nanoseconds), which will
> represent the maximal clock error on each given PHC timestamp.
> As our device sends each PHC timestamp with an error_bound value
> together, gettimex64 is the reasonable option for us and our
> recommended solution. We would like to ask for your recommendation.
Sounds like gettimex64 won't help you.
You will need to extend the socket time stamping API. That is how
time stamps are delivered to user space.
HTH,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists