netdev - Re: [net-next,v2] net: ethernet: rtsn: Add support for Renesas Ethernet-TSN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240508105831.GB1385281@ragnatech.se>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 12:58:31 +0200
From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next,v2] net: ethernet: rtsn: Add support for Renesas
 Ethernet-TSN

On 2024-05-08 02:55:44 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > +static int rtsn_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> 
> 
> > +	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> > +	pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> 
> 
> > +static int rtsn_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct rtsn_private *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > +	unregister_netdev(priv->ndev);
> > +	rtsn_mdio_free(priv);
> > +	rcar_gen4_ptp_unregister(priv->ptp_priv);
> > +	rtsn_change_mode(priv, OCR_OPC_DISABLE);
> > +	netif_napi_del(&priv->napi);
> > +
> > +	pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
> > +	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> 
> These appear to be the only two places you do any pm_ stuff. So it
> seems pointless. Maybe delete this for the moment, and come back later
> to add proper runtime power management?

I agree enable more PM stuff is a good candidate to follow initial 
entablement. But these pm_ calls are not pointless, I still need to deal 
with power. If I remove the pm_ calls things starts to fail. Maybe I can 
substitute the pm_ calls with something else, but I rather keep the pm_ 
stuff as adding suspend/resume support is high on the list of things to 
do. And reworking this now just to restore it later seems pointless as 
more PM is the way forward.

> 
>        Andrew

-- 
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund