netdev - Re: [PATCH V5 4/7] dt-bindings: clock: Add ipq9574 NSSCC clock and reset definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f00442b3-9e49-4f78-b09c-52fb72e8322c@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:06:21 +0530
From: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        "Rob Herring (Arm)"
	<robh@...nel.org>
CC: <catalin.marinas@....com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
        <mturquette@...libre.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        <arnd@...db.de>, <richardcochran@...il.com>, <will@...nel.org>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/7] dt-bindings: clock: Add ipq9574 NSSCC clock and
 reset definitions



On 7/2/2024 6:44 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/07/2024 14:13, Devi Priya wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/26/2024 9:05 PM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:02:59 +0530, Devi Priya wrote:
>>>> Add NSSCC clock and reset definitions for ipq9574.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    Changes in V5:
>>>> 	- Dropped interconnects and added interconnect-cells to NSS
>>>> 	  clock provider so that it can be  used as icc provider.
>>>>
>>>>    .../bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.yaml    |  74 +++++++++
>>>>    .../dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h    | 152 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    .../dt-bindings/reset/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h    | 134 +++++++++++++++
>>>>    3 files changed, 360 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.yaml
>>>>    create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h
>>>>    create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h
>>>>
>>>
>>> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
>>>
>>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>>
>>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>>> Error: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.example.dts:26.26-27 syntax error
>>> FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
>>> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:427: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.example.dtb] Error 1
>>> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>> make[1]: *** [/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Makefile:1430: dt_binding_check] Error 2
>>> make: *** [Makefile:240: __sub-make] Error 2
>>>
>>> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
>>>
>>> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20240626143302.810632-5-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com
>>>
>>> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
>>> should be noted in *this* patch.
>>>
>>> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
>>> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
>>> date:
>>>
>>> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>>>
>>> Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
>>> that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
>>> your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
>>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> We tried running dt_binding_check on linux-next and we do not face any
>> sort of errors.
>>
>> However in case of v6.10-rc1, patch[1] failed to apply as the dependent
>> patch[2] is not available on rc1.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20240626143302.810632-3-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com/
>>
>> [2]
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20240531&id=475beea0b9f631656b5cc39429a39696876af613
>>
>> Patch [2] does not hold any functional dependency on this series but has
>> a patch rebase dependency.
>>
>> The Bot has went ahead and tried running the dt_binding_check on patch
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20240626143302.810632-5-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com/
>> which is dependent on patch [1] and hence the issue was reported.
>>
>> Is this the expected behaviour?
> 
> If you expect your patch not to be ignored after such feedback, explain
> briefly missing dependency in changelog. I think Rob told it many times
> already.
> 
> Otherwise you will get this message *every time* and maintainers might
> ignore your patch, due to unresolved reports from automation.

Hi Krzysztof,

We posted our patches based on linux-next and the bot was trying to run
the dt_binding_checks on rc1 wherein patch [1] failed to apply as
patch [2] was missing on rc1 but was available on linux-next. The patch
application failure on rc1 was the reason behind the binding error and 
there were no dependencies on linux-next.

Thanks & Regards,
Devi Priya
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>