[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR11MB58653378DA5B1ADF2516488D8FA92@SJ0PR11MB5865.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 11:14:39 +0000
From: "Romanowski, Rafal" <rafal.romanowski@...el.com>
To: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>, "Fijalkowski,
Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
CC: "shayd@...dia.com" <shayd@...dia.com>, "Drewek, Wojciech"
<wojciech.drewek@...el.com>, "horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>, "Polchlopek, Mateusz"
<mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "jiri@...dia.com" <jiri@...dia.com>,
"kalesh-anakkur.purayil@...adcom.com" <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@...adcom.com>,
"Kubiak, Michal" <michal.kubiak@...el.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"pio.raczynski@...il.com" <pio.raczynski@...il.com>, "Kitszel, Przemyslaw"
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v5 04/15] ice: treat subfunction VSI
the same as PF VSI
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On Behalf Of Michal
> Swiatkowski
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2024 2:31 PM
> To: Fijalkowski, Maciej <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
> Cc: shayd@...dia.com; Drewek, Wojciech <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>;
> horms@...nel.org; Samudrala, Sridhar <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>;
> Polchlopek, Mateusz <mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> jiri@...dia.com; kalesh-anakkur.purayil@...adcom.com; Kubiak, Michal
> <michal.kubiak@...el.com>; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org;
> pio.raczynski@...il.com; Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>;
> Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v5 04/15] ice: treat subfunction VSI the
> same as PF VSI
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 01:07:22PM +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 01:24:52PM +0200, Michal Swiatkowski wrote:
> > > When subfunction VSI is open the same code as for PF VSI should be
> > > executed. Also when up is complete. Reflect that in code by adding
> > > subfunction VSI to consideration.
> > >
> > > In case of stopping, PF doesn't have additional tasks, so the same
> > > is with subfunction VSI.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski
> > > <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 5 +++--
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> > > index e76e19036593..ddc348371841 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> > > @@ -6726,7 +6726,8 @@ static int ice_up_complete(struct ice_vsi
Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <rafal.romanowski@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists