[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240913.065543.2091600194424222387.fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:55:43 +0000 (UTC)
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
To: hfdevel@....net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, fujita.tomonori@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: tn40xx: register swnode and connect
it to the mdiobus
Hi,
Thanks a lot for the work!
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 21:34:47 +0200
Hans-Frieder Vogt <hfdevel@....net> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/tehuti/tn40.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/tehuti/tn40.c
> index 4e6f2f781ffc..240a79a08d58 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/tehuti/tn40.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/tehuti/tn40.c
> @@ -1781,7 +1781,7 @@ static int tn40_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> ret = tn40_phy_register(priv);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to set up PHY.\n");
> - goto err_free_irq;
> + goto err_unregister_swnodes;
> }
>
> ret = tn40_priv_init(priv);
> @@ -1798,6 +1798,10 @@ static int tn40_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> return 0;
> err_unregister_phydev:
> tn40_phy_unregister(priv);
> +err_unregister_swnodes:
> + device_remove_software_node(&priv->mdio->dev);
> + software_node_unregister_node_group(priv->nodes.group);
> + software_node_unregister(priv->nodes.group[SWNODE_MDIO]);
Why this workaround is necessary? The problem lies on software node
side?
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/tehuti/tn40_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/tehuti/tn40_mdio.c
> index af18615d64a8..bbd95fabbea0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/tehuti/tn40_mdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/tehuti/tn40_mdio.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
> (FIELD_PREP(TN40_MDIO_PRTAD_MASK, (port))))
> #define TN40_MDIO_CMD_READ BIT(15)
>
> +#define AQR105_FIRMWARE "tehuti/aqr105-tn40xx.cld"
This firmware is for AQR PHY so aquantia directory is the better
place?
> +static int tn40_swnodes_register(struct tn40_priv *priv)
> +{
> + struct tn40_nodes *nodes = &priv->nodes;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = priv->pdev;
> + struct software_node *swnodes;
> + u32 id;
> +
> + id = pci_dev_id(pdev);
> +
> + snprintf(nodes->phy_name, sizeof(nodes->phy_name), "tn40_aqr105_phy");
This doesn't work on a system having multiple TN40 cards because it
tries create duplicated sysfs directory.
I uses a machine with TN9310 (QT2025 PHY) and TN9510 (AQR105 PHY).
> +MODULE_FIRMWARE(AQR105_FIRMWARE);
AQR PHY driver better to have the above? Otherwise, how about adding
it to tn40.c? It already has MODULE_FIRMWARE(TN40_FIRMWARE_NAME).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists