[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77c438b9-2186-49f4-b95b-5e2df61a573b@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 17:26:49 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 14/14] ipv6: Get rid of RTNL for
SIOCADDRT and RTM_NEWROUTE.
On 4/14/25 8:15 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> @@ -5250,7 +5252,7 @@ static int rtm_to_fib6_config(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> cfg->fc_encap_type = nla_get_u16(tb[RTA_ENCAP_TYPE]);
>
> err = lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(cfg->fc_encap_type,
> - extack, newroute);
> + extack, false);
It looks every caller always pass 'false' as last argument to
lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(), so such argument could/should be dropped
(as a follow-up if this is too big)
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists