[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36c2a487-4f74-4be3-af66-0dadd1538c64@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 17:17:13 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 13/14] ipv6: Protect nh->f6i_list with
spinlock and flag.
On 4/14/25 8:15 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> @@ -1498,7 +1504,23 @@ int fib6_add(struct fib6_node *root, struct fib6_info *rt,
> }
> #endif
>
> - err = fib6_add_rt2node(fn, rt, info, extack, &purge_list);
> + if (rt->nh) {
> + spin_lock(&rt->nh->lock);
> +
> + if (rt->nh->dead) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop has been deleted");
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + err = fib6_add_rt2node(fn, rt, info, extack, &purge_list);
> + if (!err)
> + list_add(&rt->nh_list, &rt->nh->f6i_list);
> + }
Maybe move the new check and list_add inside fib6_add_rt2node() or
bundle all the above in a new helper?
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists