lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <88b0892f-5994-4b7a-9de3-eab39075acaa@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 20:12:41 +0900
From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
 "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: rcar_canfd: Describe channel-specific FD registers
 using C struct

Hi Geert,

Thanks for the patch.

On 19/06/2025 at 19:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The rcar_canfd_f_*() inline functions to obtain channel-specific CAN-FD
> register offsets really describe a memory layout.  Hence replace them by
> a C structure, to simplify the code, and reduce kernel size.
> 
> This also gets rid of warnings about unused rcar_canfd_f_*() inline
> functions, which are reported by recent versions of clang.
> 
> Suggested-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
> Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/20250618183827.5bebca8f@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
> Fast-tracked because of the clang warnings.

Make sense.

@Jakub, OK for me if you want to directly pick this patch without going through
the linux-can tree.

> Changes compared to Vincent's original suggestion
> (https://lore.kernel.org/420d37b1-5648-4209-8d6f-1ac9d780eea2@wanadoo.fr):
>   - Move rcar_canfd_f to the old RCANFD_F_*() location,
>   - Update RSCFDnCFDCmXXX comment.
>   - Rename struct rcar_canfd_f to struct rcar_canfd_f,
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^
rcar_canfd_f_c ;)

>   - Rename cbase to fcbase,
>   - Drop static_assert(),
>   - Drop unused car_canfd_*_reg() functions.
>   - Drop simple wrappers around {read,write}l(),

Acked-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>


Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ