[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1bae4d7-98f7-4fe6-96ba-c237330c5a64@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 14:43:49 +0530
From: Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Dust Li <dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Sidraya Jayagond
<sidraya@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>, Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 4/7] smc: Use __sk_dst_get() and dst_dev_rcu()
in smc_vlan_by_tcpsk().
On 17/09/25 3:17 am, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> Note that the returned value of smc_vlan_by_tcpsk() is not used
> in the caller.
I see that smc_vlan_by_tcpsk() is called in net/smc/af_smc.c file & the
return value is used in if block to decide whether the ini->vlan_id is
set or not. In failure case, the return value has an impact on the CLC
handshake.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists