lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h5vbp3vi.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 15:50:09 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel_team@...ynix.com,
 harry.yoo@...cle.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
 davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, hawk@...nel.org,
 john.fastabend@...il.com, sdf@...ichev.me, saeedm@...dia.com,
 leon@...nel.org, tariqt@...dia.com, mbloch@...dia.com,
 andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
 Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org,
 surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, horms@...nel.org, jackmanb@...gle.com,
 hannes@...xchg.org, ziy@...dia.com, ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org,
 willy@...radead.org, brauner@...nel.org, kas@...nel.org,
 yuzhao@...gle.com, usamaarif642@...il.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
 almasrymina@...gle.com, asml.silence@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, dw@...idwei.uk,
 ap420073@...il.com, dtatulea@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC mm v5 2/2] mm: introduce a new page type for page pool in
 page type

Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> writes:

> On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 01:26:01PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> writes:
>> 
>> > Currently, the condition 'page->pp_magic == PP_SIGNATURE' is used to
>> > determine if a page belongs to a page pool.  However, with the planned
>> > removal of ->pp_magic, we should instead leverage the page_type in
>> > struct page, such as PGTY_netpp, for this purpose.
>> >
>> > Introduce and use the page type APIs e.g. PageNetpp(), __SetPageNetpp(),
>> > and __ClearPageNetpp() instead, and remove the existing APIs accessing
>> > ->pp_magic e.g. page_pool_page_is_pp(), netmem_or_pp_magic(), and
>> > netmem_clear_pp_magic().
>> >
>> > This work was inspired by the following link:
>> >
>> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/582f41c0-2742-4400-9c81-0d46bf4e8314@gmail.com/
>> >
>> > While at it, move the sanity check for page pool to on free.
>> >
>> > Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> > Co-developed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
>> > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> > Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
>> > Acked-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
>> 
>> Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
>> 
>> IIUC, this will allow us to move the PP-specific fields out of struct
>> page entirely at some point, right? What are the steps needed to get to
>> that point after this?
>
> Yes, it'd be almost done once this set gets merged :-)
>
> Will check if I can safely remove pp fields from struct page, and do
> it!

Sounds good, thanks!

-Toke


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ