[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251107183712.36228f2a@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 18:37:12 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel_team@...ynix.com,
harry.yoo@...cle.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
davem@...emloft.net, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
sdf@...ichev.me, saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org, tariqt@...dia.com,
mbloch@...dia.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
rppt@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, horms@...nel.org,
jackmanb@...gle.com, hannes@...xchg.org, ziy@...dia.com,
ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, willy@...radead.org, brauner@...nel.org,
kas@...nel.org, yuzhao@...gle.com, usamaarif642@...il.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, almasrymina@...gle.com, toke@...hat.com,
asml.silence@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, dw@...idwei.uk, ap420073@...il.com,
dtatulea@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC mm v5 1/2] page_pool: check nmdesc->pp to see its usage as
page pool for net_iov not page-backed
On Sat, 8 Nov 2025 11:24:58 +0900 Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 05:41:29PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Nov 2025 13:47:08 +0900 Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > The offset of page_type in struct page cannot be used in struct net_iov
> > > for the same purpose, since the offset in struct net_iov is for storing
> > > (struct net_iov_area *)owner.
> >
> > owner does not have to be at a fixed offset. Can we not move owner
> > to _pp_mapping_pad ? Or reorder it with type, enum net_iov_type
> > only has 2 values we can smoosh it with page_type easily.
>
> I'm still confused. I think you probably understand what this work is
> for. (I've explained several times with related links.) Or am I
> missing something from your questions?
>
> I've answered your question directly since you asked, but the point is
> that, struct net_iov will no longer overlay on struct page.
>
> Instead, struct netmem_desc will be responsible for keeping the pp
> fields while struct page will lay down the resonsibility, once the pp
> fields will be removed from struct page like:
I understand the end goal. I don't understand why patch 1 is a step
in that direction, and you seem incapable of explaining it. So please
either follow my suggestion on how to proceed with patch 2 without
patch 1 in current form. Or come back when have the full conversion
ready.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists