[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44EDF9DD.3040904@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:11:25 -0700
From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, akpm@...l.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ext2-devel <Ext2-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Manage jbd allocations from its own slabs
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 04:08:15PM -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is the fix to "bh: Ensure bh fits within a page" problem
>> caused by JBD.
>>
>> BTW, I realized that this problem can happen only with 1k, 2k
>> filesystems - as 4k, 8k allocations disable slab debug
>> automatically. But for completeness, I created slabs for those
>> also.
>>
>> What do you think ? I ran basic tests and things are fine.
>>
>
> Why can't you just use alloc_page? I bet the whole slab overhead
> eats more memory than what's wasted when using alloc_pages. Especially
> as the typical usecase is a 4k blocks filesystem with 4k pagesize
> where the overhead of alloc_page is non-existant.
>
Yes. That was what proposed earlier. But for 1k, 2k allocations we end
up wasting whole page.
Isn't it ? Thats why I created right sized slabs and disable slab-debug.
I guess, I can do this
only for 1k, 2k filesystems and directly use alloc_page() for 4k and 8k
- but that would make
code ugly and also it doesn't handle cases for bigger base pagesize
systems (64k power).
Thanks,
Badari
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists