[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4FB0D93A.7000108@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 19:06:50 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] MFD: MAX77693: add IRQ handler
Hi Mark,
On 05/14/2012 06:57 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 02:20:35PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>
>> + if (!max77693->irq) {
>> + dev_warn(max77693->dev, "No interrupt specified.\n");
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>
> I'd suggest just setting up the IRQ domain anyway - it makes life
> simpler in the other drivers for the chip as they don't need to worry if
> interrupts are registered unless it's very important to them that they
> go off which is often not the case. Just skip actually claiming the
> IRQ.
>
This patch add support irq domain for MAX77693 in the
max77693_irq_init() function.
You can check on patchset. Then, The 'max77693->irq' is gpio pin for
IRQ. max77693->irq
is meant to indicate to the application processor that the status of
MAX77693 has changed.
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(max77693_irq_resume);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(max77693_irq_init);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(max77693_irq_exit);
>
> These shouldn't need to be exported, they're only used by the MFD core.
OK, I remove it.
Thank you,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists