lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121217083759.0cbed418@lwn.net>
Date:	Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:37:59 -0700
From:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:	Marcos Lois Bermúdez <marcos.discalis@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about using new request_threaded_irq

On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:11:22 +0100
Marcos Lois Bermúdez <marcos.discalis@...il.com> wrote:

> For my understand if i call for example:
> 
> request_threaded_irq(irqmum, NULL, irq_handle, IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, 
> DEVICE_NAME, priv);
> 
> This seem to make a old Hard IRQ handler, and inside of this handler 
> sleep APIs can't be used, but i see some SPI drivers that seem to 
> register a IRQ of this form and make API calls that can sleep in the 
> handler.

Not quite.  The prototype for request_threaded_irq() is:

int request_threaded_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
			 irq_handler_t thread_fn, unsigned long irqflags,
			 const char *devname, void *dev_id)

Note the presents of *two* handlers, called "handler" and "thread_fn".
The first, "handler", is called in interrupt context; it's job is usually
to quiet the device and return; it cannot sleep.  If it's return value is
IRQ_WAKE_THREAD, the thread_fn() will be called in process context; it
*can* sleep.  In the example you cite, there is no immediate handler, only
the thread_fn(); the call to a blocking function from within the
thread_fn() is correct.

Hope that helps,

jon

Jonathan Corbet / LWN.net / corbet@....net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ